Notes for ILS talk by Michael Rubenstein — 26 April 2017
- Sobczyszyn v Podstawowa, C-178/15  IRLR 725 CJEU
An employee is entitled to paid annual leave in respect of time during which they were on sick leave.
- King v The Sash Window Workshop Ltd, C-214/16 CJEU- pending
Can annual leave be carried over where the worker would have taken more holiday but for the fact that the employer refused to pay him for that period?
- Maschek v Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien, C-341/15  IRLR 801 CJEU
An employee who has terminated their own employment is entitled to pay in lieu of untaken holiday entitlement.
- Kreuziger v Land Berlin, C-619/16 CJEU – pending
Is an employee entitled to pay in lieu of untaken annual holiday entitlement if they did not apply for annual holiday but could have?
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Shimizu, C-684/16 CJEU – pending
Can entitlement to annual leave be made conditional on the employee informing the employer of their preferred holiday dates?
- Ville de Nivelles v Matzak, C-518/15, CJEU – pending
Is on call time for firefighters working time where they are at home but have a duty to respond within eight minutes?
- Hälvä v SOS-Lapsikylä ry, C-175/16, CJEU – pending
Does work in a children’s home acting as the representative of foster parents on their days off fall within the “family work” derogation?
Transfer of undertakings
- Unionen v Almega Tjänsteförbunden, ISS Facility Services AB, C-336/15, 6 April 2017 CJEU
The Directive precludes discrimination a year after the transfer as regards terms of employment between former employees of the transferor and employees of transferee.
- Asklepios Kliniken Langen-Seligenstadt v Felja, C-680/15, CJEU – pending
Is a contractual term which provides that terms of employment transfer on a dynamic basis precluded by the Directive where neither the transferor nor the transferee belong to the relevant employer’s association?
- Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v. Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis, C-201/15  IRLR 282 CJEU (GC)
Greek legislation requiring authorisation of redundancy dismissals contravenes the right to freedom of establishment in Article 49 of the EU Treaty.
- Socha v Szpital Specjalistczny, C-149/16, CJEU – pending
Is the obligation to consult triggered by contractual notice to change pay and working conditions?
- Hampshire v Board of the Pension Protection Fund, C-17/17, CJEU – pending
Does the Insolvency Protection Directive require each employee of an insolvent employer to receive at least 50% of the value of their accrued pension entitlement?
- Mattu v United Kingdom, ECtHR – pending
Does Article 6 protection apply to how an employer conducts a disciplinary procedure?
- Barbulescu v Romania, ECtHR (GC) – pending
Is it a violation of the Article 8 right to privacy for an employer to access an employee’s work-related email account to ensure that it is not being used for personal purposes?
- Surikov v Ukraine,  IRLR 377 ECtHR
Collection, storage, and disclosure of mental health information by employer violated Article 8.
Trade union rights
- Unite the Union v United Kingdom,  IRLR 438 ECtHR
Abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board was not contrary to Article 11 of the European Convention.
- Smith v United Kingdom, ECtHR – pending
Does the absence of a remedy for an agency worker blacklisted by an end user violate the European Convention?
- IWGB v United Kingdom, ECtHR – pending
Does the bar on a trade union under UK law from making an application for statutory recognition where another union is recognised contravene Article 11?
- Straume v Latvia, ECtHR – pending
Did dismissal of trade union leader following letter of complaint about working conditions contravene Convention rights?
Fixed term work
- Diego Porras v Ministerio de Defensa, C-596/14  IRLR 964 CJEU
That a worker was employed under a temporary replacement contract was not an objective justification for not making a severance payment when permanent workers received one. “Objective grounds” requires unequal treatment to be justified by precise, specific factors.
- Pérez López v Servicio Madrileῇo de Salud (Comunidad de Madrid), C-16/15  IRLR 978 CJEU
It is contrary to the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work for fixed-term contracts to be used to cover permanent needs.
- Otero Ramos v Servizo Galego de Saude, C-531/15, CJEU – pending
How does the burden of proof operate in a case where a risk has been identified for a woman who is breastfeeding?
- Porras Guisado v Bankia SA, C-103/16, CJEU – pending
Are redundancy dismissals “exceptional cases not connected” with pregnancy falling within the exception in Article 10?
Sexual orientation discrimination
- Parris v Trinity College, Dublin, C-443/15,  IRLR 173 CJEU
It is not unlawful sexual orientation discrimination for an occupational pension scheme to only pay survivor’s benefit to a civil partner if they entered into the civil partnership before the member’s 60th birthday, where the national civil partnership legislation did not come into force until after the member’s 60th birthday.
- Daouidi v Bootes Plus SL, C-395/15  IRLR 151 CJEU
The Directive only protects “long-term” impairments.
- Milkova v Izpalnitelen director na Agentsiata za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen control, C-406/15, 9 March 2017 CJEU
A difference in treatment is only on grounds of disability if it is based on a criterion that is “inseparably linked” to disability.
- Ruiz Conejero v Ferroser Servicios Auxiliares SA, C-270/16, CJEU – pending
Does the Directive preclude absence management policies which treat the same as other employees disabled employees whose absence was caused by the disability?
- Finans A/S v Ligebehandlingsnaevnet, acting on behalf of Huskic, C-668/15, CJEU – pending
Does the prohibition on discrimination on grounds of ethnic origin apply to less favourable treatment of persons born outside the European Economic Area?
- Kratzer v R+V Allgemeine Versicherung AG, C-423/15,  IRLR 888 CJEU
A claimant who claims to have been rejected on discriminatory grounds cannot be regarded as seeking “access to employment” if he is not actually seeking to be employed in the job.
- C, C-122/15,  IRLR 643 CJEU
National income tax legislation which levies a supplementary tax on pensions cannot be challenged under the Framework Employment Equality Directive as being age discrimination.
- de Lange v Staatssecretaris van Financien, C-548/15,  IRLR 278 CJEU
The Framework Employment Equality Directive’s prohibition on age discrimination applies to tax concessions relating to study costs.
- Abercrombie & Fitch Italia Srl v Bordonaro, C-143/16, CJEU – pending
Is Italian legislation allowing those under age 25 to be given on-call contracts unlawful age discrimination?
- Dansk Industri (DI), acting on behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Rasmussen, C-441/14,  IRLR 552 CJEU (GC)
A national court cannot decide that the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations outweigh the principle prohibiting discrimination on grounds of age.
- Salaberria Sorrondo v Academia Vasca de Policia y Emergencias, C-258/15,  IRLR 162 CJEU (GC)
A maximum age of 35 for recruitment as a police officer is not age discrimination contrary to the Directive.
- Fries v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH, C-190/16, CJEU – pending
Is the compulsory retirement age of 65 for commercial airline pilots unlawful age discrimination?
Discrimination on grounds of religion or belief
- Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV, C-157/15  IRLR 466 CJEU (GC)
A prohibition on wearing an Islamic headscarf may be objectively justified indirect discrimination if it is part of a policy of religious “neutrality” in the workplace.
- Bougnaoui v Micropole SA, C-188/15  IRLR 447 CJEU (GC)
A prohibition on wearing an Islamic headscarf cannot be justified on the basis that customer preference is a genuine occupational qualification.
- Ypourgos Esoterikon v Kalliri, C-409/16, CJEU – pending
Is a minimum height requirement for police recruits indirectly discriminatory against women?
Copyright Michael Rubenstein
All rights reserved
22 QCs on the Hot Employment Law Issues 2017– 18
5 and 6 October 2017
Devised and chaired by Michael Rubenstein
Strand Palace Hotel, Central London
22 topics, 22 fantastic presenters
Register now for early bird discount for this unique event:
What they said about 22 QCs 2016:
“Great conference, thank you. What an exceptional series of briefings on a huge range of topics given by the thought-leaders in the field – the added value for practitioners is massive. It is the best conference I have ever attended.”
Louise Hobbs, Partner, Signet Partners
“An exceptional array of expert speakers.”
Hazel Craik, Head of Employment, NHS Central Legal Office
“Superb – all experts delivering up to date material – clearly well prepared.” Tom Mallon, barrister (Ireland)
“Fantastic. The best CPD course there is.”
Anne Petersen, Solicitor, Bech Bruun
“First class – the best employment law training available.”
Paul Jennings, Partner, Bates Wells Braithwaite
“I’ve been attending this course for the last 4 years. It’s by far the best update course with a brilliant team of organisers and speakers each year.”
Arjumand Sheikh, Principal, Strand Solicitors